Global rank #219
Impression
- Location
- Nottingham, United Kingdom
- Primary service
- SEO
- Client fit
- Mid-market
- Price band
- $$$
- Technical SEO
- Strong
- AI search
- Supporting capability
- Implementation
- Strategy-led
- Evidence
- 1 source
Agency comparison
Impression vs The SEO Works
Impression and The SEO Works both list SEO. Compare their published work, delivery model and fit for your brief. Impression is based in Nottingham and The SEO Works in Sheffield, both in the United Kingdom.
At a glance
Side-by-side comparison
| Metric | Impression | The SEO Works |
|---|---|---|
| Global rank | #219 | #220 |
| Location | Nottingham, United Kingdom | Sheffield, United Kingdom |
| Primary specialisation | SEO | SEO |
| Other services | Digital PR and Growth | Local SEO and eCommerce |
| Technical SEO | Strong | Strong |
| AI-search position | Supporting capability | Supporting capability |
| Implementation | Strategy-led | Implementation support |
| Strategic breadth | Focused | Focused |
| Public evidence | 1 source | 1 source |
| Client fit | Mid-market | Mid-market |
| Price band | $$$ | $$ |
Global rank #220
The SEO Works
- Location
- Sheffield, United Kingdom
- Primary service
- SEO
- Client fit
- Mid-market
- Price band
- $$
- Technical SEO
- Strong
- AI search
- Supporting capability
- Implementation
- Implementation support
- Evidence
- 1 source
Service and delivery
How the agencies differ
Listed capabilities
Impression lists Digital PR and Growth. Check relevant client work and the proposed team for these services.
The SEO Works lists Local SEO and eCommerce. Check relevant client work and the proposed team for these services.
Client model and sources
Impression is classified for mid-market organisations at $$$. The SEO Works is classified for mid-market organisations at $$. The bands are relative positions within this directory, not fee quotes or quality scores.
1 public source supports the Impression profile; 1 supports The SEO Works. Both appear in the United Kingdom country ranking.
The published dataset does not contain live availability, named project teams, contract terms or proposal-level scope for either agency.
AEO and GEO: compare the published scope
Service evidence checked on 10 October 2026. These notes describe published offers and do not change the agencies’ existing rankings or independently verify outcomes.
Impression
GEO
Combines technical GEO, content and PR, and describes separate tracking for mentions, citations and sentiment.
Ask: Request the prompt sample, market coverage and attribution method behind its reported outcomes.
Published GEO serviceThe SEO Works
No separate AEO or GEO service record was included in this evidence update. Check the profile’s existing sources and ask the agency to confirm its current scope; absence here does not establish that it lacks the capability.
Use the SEO, AEO and GEO comparison guide to set the same questions and deliverables for both proposals.
Strongest fit
Where each agency stands out
Consider Impression for a brief centred on Digital PR and Growth. Confirm the scope, delivery team and fees directly.
Impression profileConsider The SEO Works for a brief centred on Local SEO and eCommerce. Confirm the scope, delivery team and fees directly.
The SEO Works profileFrequently asked questions
Impression and The SEO Works
Which agency ranks higher: Impression or The SEO Works?
Impression ranks higher at #219 globally; The SEO Works is #220.
How do Impression and The SEO Works compare on price?
Impression is placed in the $$$ relative price band and The SEO Works in the $$ band. The symbols are directory comparison bands, not quotations.
What services do both agencies list?
SEO appear in both profiles.
Explore the evidence behind this comparison.
Data checked 10 September 2026. Price bands are relative, not quotations.