Global rank #218
Builtvisible
- Location
- London, United Kingdom
- Primary service
- Technical SEO
- Client fit
- Enterprise
- Price band
- $$$
- Technical SEO
- Leading
- AI search
- Supporting capability
- Implementation
- Implementation support
- Evidence
- 1 source
Agency comparison
Builtvisible vs Impression
Builtvisible and Impression both list Digital PR. Compare their published work, delivery model and fit for your brief. Builtvisible is based in London and Impression in Nottingham, both in the United Kingdom.
At a glance
Side-by-side comparison
| Metric | Builtvisible | Impression |
|---|---|---|
| Global rank | #218 | #219 |
| Location | London, United Kingdom | Nottingham, United Kingdom |
| Primary specialisation | Technical SEO | SEO |
| Other services | Content and Digital PR | Digital PR and Growth |
| Technical SEO | Leading | Strong |
| AI-search position | Supporting capability | Supporting capability |
| Implementation | Implementation support | Strategy-led |
| Strategic breadth | Focused | Focused |
| Public evidence | 1 source | 1 source |
| Client fit | Enterprise | Mid-market |
| Price band | $$$ | $$$ |
Global rank #219
Impression
- Location
- Nottingham, United Kingdom
- Primary service
- SEO
- Client fit
- Mid-market
- Price band
- $$$
- Technical SEO
- Strong
- AI search
- Supporting capability
- Implementation
- Strategy-led
- Evidence
- 1 source
Service and delivery
How the agencies differ
Listed capabilities
Builtvisible lists Technical SEO and Content. Check relevant client work and the proposed team for these services.
Impression lists SEO and Growth. Check relevant client work and the proposed team for these services.
Client model and sources
Builtvisible is classified for enterprise organisations at $$$. Impression is classified for mid-market organisations at $$$. The bands are relative positions within this directory, not fee quotes or quality scores.
1 public source supports the Builtvisible profile; 1 supports Impression. Both appear in the United Kingdom country ranking.
The published dataset does not contain live availability, named project teams, contract terms or proposal-level scope for either agency.
AEO and GEO: compare the published scope
Service evidence checked on 10 October 2026. These notes describe published offers and do not change the agencies’ existing rankings or independently verify outcomes.
Builtvisible
No separate AEO or GEO service record was included in this evidence update. Check the profile’s existing sources and ask the agency to confirm its current scope; absence here does not establish that it lacks the capability.
Impression
GEO
Combines technical GEO, content and PR, and describes separate tracking for mentions, citations and sentiment.
Ask: Request the prompt sample, market coverage and attribution method behind its reported outcomes.
Published GEO serviceUse the SEO, AEO and GEO comparison guide to set the same questions and deliverables for both proposals.
Strongest fit
Where each agency stands out
Consider Builtvisible for a brief centred on Technical SEO and Content. Confirm the scope, delivery team and fees directly.
Builtvisible profileConsider Impression for a brief centred on SEO and Growth. Confirm the scope, delivery team and fees directly.
Impression profileFrequently asked questions
Builtvisible and Impression
Which agency ranks higher: Builtvisible or Impression?
Builtvisible ranks higher at #218 globally; Impression is #219.
How do Builtvisible and Impression compare on price?
Builtvisible is placed in the $$$ relative price band and Impression in the $$$ band. The symbols are directory comparison bands, not quotations.
What services do both agencies list?
Digital PR appear in both profiles.
Explore the evidence behind this comparison.
Data checked 10 September 2026. Price bands are relative, not quotations.