Global rank #4
Reboot Online
- Location
- London, United Kingdom
- Primary service
- Digital PR
- Client fit
- Enterprise
- Price band
- $$$
- Technical SEO
- Leading
- AI search
- Listed service
- Implementation
- Strategy-led
- Evidence
- 5 sources

Agency comparison
Reboot Online and StudioHawk both list Enterprise SEO and AI search. Compare their published work, delivery model and fit for your brief. Reboot Online is based in London, United Kingdom; StudioHawk is based in Melbourne, Australia.

At a glance
| Metric | Reboot Online | StudioHawk |
|---|---|---|
| Global rank | #4 | #7 |
| Location | London, United Kingdom | Melbourne, Australia |
| Primary specialisation | Digital PR | Technical SEO |
| Other services | Enterprise SEO, AI search and Content | Enterprise SEO, eCommerce and AI search |
| Technical SEO | Leading | Leading |
| AI-search position | Listed service | Listed service |
| Implementation | Strategy-led | Implementation support |
| Strategic breadth | Broad | Broad |
| Public evidence | 5 sources | 4 sources |
| Client fit | Enterprise | Mid-market |
| Price band | $$$ | $$ |
Global rank #4
Global rank #7
Service and delivery
Reboot Online: The Adzuna example describes collecting primary survey data and turning it into a media story and visual asset. Its GEO material adds commercially relevant prompt targeting, providing two different strands of evidence for a combined search and PR brief.
StudioHawk: The AI SEO service starts with site structure, content, internal links and backlinks, then adds AI visibility analysis. Its specialist model is useful when search needs a dedicated team alongside existing creative, paid-media or development suppliers.
Reboot Online is classified for enterprise organisations at $$$. StudioHawk is classified for mid-market organisations at $$. The bands are relative positions within this directory, not fee quotes or quality scores.
Reboot Online publishes “Adzuna research-led PR”; StudioHawk publishes “AI-search behaviour across 100 ecommerce brands”. Both are agency-published sources. 5 public sources support the Reboot Online profile; 4 support StudioHawk. The agencies appear in different country rankings.
The published dataset does not contain live availability, named project teams, contract terms or proposal-level scope for either agency.
Service evidence checked on 10 October 2026. These notes describe published offers and do not change the agencies’ existing rankings or independently verify outcomes.
No separate AEO or GEO service record was included in this evidence update. Check the profile’s existing sources and ask the agency to confirm its current scope; absence here does not establish that it lacks the capability.
Presents AI-search work as part of its SEO service, with structured content and visibility in AI answers.
Ask: Confirm which answer-focused work is included in the SEO scope and how content changes are prioritised.
Published AEO serviceDescribes GEO as integrated SEO work rather than a separate product, with mentions and citations included in measurement.
Ask: Ask for a sample report showing how AI visibility is separated from conventional organic performance.
Published GEO serviceUse the SEO, AEO and GEO comparison guide to set the same questions and deliverables for both proposals.
Strongest fit
Brands that need original research, earned coverage and search authority developed together rather than through separate content and PR briefs.
Reboot Online profileMarketing teams seeking a dedicated SEO partner for technical foundations, ecommerce discovery and AI-search visibility.
StudioHawk profileFrequently asked questions
Reboot Online ranks higher at #4 globally; StudioHawk is #7.
Reboot Online is placed in the $$$ relative price band and StudioHawk in the $$ band. The symbols are directory comparison bands, not quotations.
Enterprise SEO and AI search appear in both profiles.
Explore the evidence behind this comparison.
Data checked 10 September 2026. Price bands are relative, not quotations.