Global rank #115
MONSOON
- Location
- Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Primary service
- SEO
- Client fit
- Mid-market
- Price band
- $$
- Technical SEO
- Strong
- AI search
- Supporting capability
- Implementation
- Strategy-led
- Evidence
- 1 source
Agency comparison
MONSOON and Seeders are both credible shortlist options, but they fit different briefs. MONSOON is ranked #115 globally and is strongest for seo, while Seeders is ranked #111 and leads with digital pr. Both operate from Netherlands, with MONSOON based in Amsterdam and Seeders in Zwolle. The better fit depends on the services, client model and engagement band your brief requires.
At a glance
| Metric | MONSOON | Seeders |
|---|---|---|
| Global rank | #115 | #111 |
| Location | Amsterdam, Netherlands | Zwolle, Netherlands |
| Primary specialisation | SEO | Digital PR |
| Other services | Growth and International SEO | International SEO and AI search |
| Technical SEO | Strong | Strong |
| AI-search position | Supporting capability | Listed service |
| Implementation | Strategy-led | Strategy-led |
| Strategic breadth | Focused | Focused |
| Public evidence | 1 source | 1 source |
| Client fit | Mid-market | Mid-market |
| Price band | $$ | $$ |
Global rank #115
Global rank #111
Detailed comparison
The two agencies overlap across International SEO, which makes a direct comparison useful. MONSOON is assessed as established for AI SEO and strong for established SEO work. Its distinctive listed capabilities include SEO and Growth. Seeders is assessed as strong for AI SEO and strong for SEO, with Digital PR and AI search helping to distinguish its offer. These labels compare the range and public evidence visible during the August 2026 assessment; they are not guarantees of a particular ranking, citation or commercial outcome. Buyers should ask each agency to show recent work that matches the technical environment, market and search problem in the brief.
MONSOON is listed for mid-market organisations in the $$ engagement band. Seeders is listed for mid-market organisations in the $$ band. These are relative comparison bands rather than quotations, and a higher band is not a quality score. Scope, senior involvement, contract length and implementation support can all change the real cost.
Leading Search List reviewed 1 public source for MONSOON and 1 for Seeders. The evidence supports an editorial comparison, but it does not replace buyer due diligence. Because both agencies are listed in the Netherlands, team fit and delivery model may matter more than location.
Ask both agencies to price the same written scope. Request a named delivery team, a ninety-day plan, reporting examples and two case studies that resemble your organisation. For AI SEO, ask how visibility is measured across Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity, and how that work connects to technical SEO, authority and useful content.
Choosing between them
Choose MONSOON when seo is central to the brief, the mid-market client model fits your organisation and its SEO and Growth capabilities are more relevant to the work ahead.
Read the MONSOON reviewChoose Seeders when digital pr is the priority, its mid-market delivery model is the better match and you need more emphasis on Digital PR and AI search.
Read the Seeders reviewFrequently asked questions
MONSOON is ranked #115 globally and Seeders is ranked #111, but the higher-ranked agency is not automatically the better fit for every brief. Compare their primary services, client fit, evidence and proposed delivery team against the same written requirements.
MONSOON is placed in the $$ relative price band and Seeders in the $$ band. These symbols are comparison guides, not quotations. Confirm current fees, minimum engagement, currency and included services directly with each agency.
Explore the evidence behind this comparison.
Comparison checked 10 September 2026. Rankings, service information and price bands reflect the 2026 assessment. Confirm scope, availability and current fees directly with each agency.