Global rank #34
Chili
- Location
- São Paulo, Brazil
- Primary service
- SEO
- Client fit
- Mid-market
- Price band
- $$
- Technical SEO
- Strong
- AI search
- Supporting capability
- Implementation
- Strategy-led
- Evidence
- 3 sources
Agency comparison
Chili vs Gear SEO
Chili and Gear SEO have different listed service mixes. Compare their published work, delivery model and fit for your brief. Both are based in São Paulo, Brazil.
At a glance
Side-by-side comparison
| Metric | Chili | Gear SEO |
|---|---|---|
| Global rank | #34 | #33 |
| Location | São Paulo, Brazil | São Paulo, Brazil |
| Primary specialisation | SEO | Technical SEO |
| Other services | Growth and Content | Enterprise SEO and Analytics |
| Technical SEO | Strong | Leading |
| AI-search position | Supporting capability | Supporting capability |
| Implementation | Strategy-led | Implementation support |
| Strategic breadth | Focused | Broad |
| Public evidence | 3 sources | 2 sources |
| Client fit | Mid-market | Enterprise |
| Price band | $$ | $$$ |
Global rank #33
Gear SEO
- Location
- São Paulo, Brazil
- Primary service
- Technical SEO
- Client fit
- Enterprise
- Price band
- $$$
- Technical SEO
- Leading
- AI search
- Supporting capability
- Implementation
- Implementation support
- Evidence
- 2 sources
Service and delivery
How the agencies differ
Listed capabilities
Chili: The catalogue includes ecommerce, local and international SEO, Google advertising and social campaigns. The Joico case is an organic-search example within a broader portfolio of acquisition work.
Gear SEO: The Suvinil work describes technical diagnosis across three web environments, content planning and editorial outreach. The agency also describes proprietary tooling and direct access to specialists.
Client model and sources
Chili is classified for mid-market organisations at $$. Gear SEO is classified for enterprise organisations at $$$. The bands are relative positions within this directory, not fee quotes or quality scores.
Chili publishes “Joico organic-search programme”; Gear SEO publishes “Suvinil website ecosystem”. Both are agency-published sources. 3 public sources support the Chili profile; 2 support Gear SEO. Both appear in the Brazil country ranking.
The published dataset does not contain live availability, named project teams, contract terms or proposal-level scope for either agency.
Strongest fit
Where each agency stands out
Businesses seeking coordinated organic and paid acquisition in Latin America, with clear channel-level reporting.
Chili profileEnterprise teams managing several connected web properties and audiences with different search intentions.
Gear SEO profileFrequently asked questions
Chili and Gear SEO
Which agency ranks higher: Chili or Gear SEO?
Gear SEO ranks higher at #33 globally; Chili is #34.
How do Chili and Gear SEO compare on price?
Chili is placed in the $$ relative price band and Gear SEO in the $$$ band. The symbols are directory comparison bands, not quotations.
What services do both agencies list?
The current profiles do not contain an identical listed service.
Explore the evidence behind this comparison.
Data checked 10 September 2026. Price bands are relative, not quotations.